App Store availability index

No crypto app publishes a list of the countries it serves. Apple does, by implication, one storefront at a time, and anyone can read it without an account. This index reads all of it at once: the same five apps against the same 50 country App Stores, on a stated date, with the full matrix published rather than summarised.

Latest edition: October 2026

The headline: the UK gap is not fomo's alone. On 20 Oct 2026, two of the five apps were missing from the United Kingdom storefront, Moonshot and fomo, and they are the two newest listings in the set. The three present in the UK are the three oldest. One company skipping one market is a business decision; two unrelated companies skipping the same market is a pattern worth testing again next edition.

China mainland is the only storefront in the set that sells none of the five. Russia, by contrast, drops two of the five and keeps three, which is not how the "Apple's Russian store is restricted" shorthand would have it. The October 2026 edition has the full 5 by 50 matrix, the per-app detail, the two apps that get no row and why, and the method in full.

Every edition

Each edition is a fresh capture at its own URL. Earlier editions are never edited to match a later one, because the point of dating them is that they disagree.

• App Store availability index, October 2026 captured 20 Oct 2026. 5 apps, 50 storefronts, 250 requests.

How the index is built

One request per app per storefront to Apple's public lookup endpoint. A storefront that sells the app returns its listing; one that does not returns an empty result set. No key, no account, nothing scraped.

https://itunes.apple.com/lookup?id=6741115427&country=gb&entity=software

The one error that would make an index like this worthless is publishing a failed request as a confirmed absence, because the two look identical if you are not careful. Apple throttles, and a throttled request returns no app exactly as convincingly as an empty storefront does. So every cell is one of three states: listed, not listed, or not checked. Only a successful, well-formed response with an empty result set counts as an absence; anything else is retried up to five times, and a cell that never resolves is published as not checked and never as absent. The collector refuses to call a run complete while any cell is unresolved.

An app only gets a row if we can confirm the publisher is the real company. Two names people ask about constantly, Axiom and Photon, have no first-party iOS app at all, so they have no row rather than a row filled with a lookalike. The latest edition says so in full.

Fields in the dataset

• app The iOS app, by its App Store name.
• publisher The seller name Apple returns for the listing.
• appStoreId Apple's numeric trackId for the app.
• storefront The country App Store queried, as an ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code.
• availability Listed, not listed, or not checked when every retry of the request failed.
• firstListed The date Apple first published the listing, which is the same in every storefront that sells it.

What the index cannot tell you

• Nothing about funding. A download is not a deposit. Banks, cards and Apple Pay all decide separately.
• Nothing about the app's own rules. fomo is listed in the US App Store and still bars U.S. Persons from perps.
• Nothing about Android. Google Play's web pages render everywhere regardless of availability, so they cannot be read the same way. This is an iOS measurement.
• Nothing about legality. Listed where you live is not advice that using it is lawful or wise; missing where you live is not an invitation to switch storefronts.
• Nothing permanent. Listings get added and pulled without announcement. That is why every edition carries a date and why the old ones stay up.

Why this exists

Because "is this app available in my country" is one of the most asked and worst answered questions about every app on this list, and the companies themselves are silent on it. The answers that do circulate are screenshots from one person's phone in one country on an unstated date. A dated index with the full matrix and a method you can re-run is a better answer, and when it turns out to be wrong you will be able to see exactly when it was taken.

If you want the fomo-specific version of this question, with the funding methods and the workarounds that are worth trying, that is fomo app availability by country. For what to use instead where fomo does not ship, fomo app alternatives compares the field. How we handle sourcing generally is on the methodology page.

Memecoin trading is high-risk speculation, not investing, and most people who do it lose money. Nothing on this page is financial advice. No app in this index has been installed or tested by us. Competitor facts are limited to what Apple's public endpoint returns plus each company's own published pages, with the date checked.